Court Rules New Jersey Has No Second Amendment Rights Outside Of The Household

YouViewed/Editorial

This One Is Sure To End Up In The Supreme Court 

 

” On July 31, 2013, a ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit maintained blighting New Jersey residents’ Second Amendment in the Drake v. Filko case. With the ruling, citizens are required to show proof of justifiable need for carrying a firearm before they are able to receive a license to carry concealed.

Essentially, they have to give proof that they need the firearm and can’t just purchase one solely for protection. Of course, proponents of not only the constitutional but also natural right to self-defense, are beside themselves over the court saying that a requirement such as this, “does not burden conduct within the scope of the Second Amendment’s guarantee.”

As if that’s not enough of a blow to New Jersey’s right to bear arms, in addition, the court…

View original post 25 more words

One thought on “Court Rules New Jersey Has No Second Amendment Rights Outside Of The Household

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s