I believe that these activities such as chasing consensus for AGW, arguing over theories which are unsupported empirically are all an orchestrated diversion and smoke screen.
The real danger comes from the United Nations and UN Agenda 21 which is the parent of AGW.
Is the UN a dangerous and malignant bureaucracy? My research points to this.
There is no conspiracy as everything is clearly described and published on official websites etc. All we need to do is read it!
Here is an example on Agenda 21 policy on land.
See the my highlights in red on page 8
No wonder property rights are being abused in my city under the guise of an earthquake recovery.
Ever consider the Agenda 21 wetlands policy. It works like this. 1. Persuade a farmer to part with a swampy area of his farm and label it a ‘wetlands restoration’. 2. Do nothing and let the wetland ‘recover’ which means the original drainage will block and the wetland/swamp will spread further onto the farmer’s land. 3. If the farmer in desperation clears the drainage problem then fine or gaol him. 4. Observing that there are now further spreading swamps ‘wetlands’ encroaching on said farmers land, well take that off him too. http://www.stuff.co.nz/marlborough-express/news/8790787/Farmer-guilty-of-damaging-Rarangi-wetland
Note that this guy once owned the land in question, it is not mentioned how it was transferred to the government. Also willows are mentioned. Willows are not natural in New Zealand and used to be regarded as pests because they block waterways.
In my country, maybe more than 50% of farms are comprised of more than 90% drained swamp.
Check out the warped thinking on page 12. Re: educating men or women!
My blog has more real life examples!
Please visit both posts.
I believe that these activities such as chasing consensus for AGW, arguing over theories which are unsupported empirically are all an orchestrated diversion and smoke screen.
The real danger comes from the United Nations and UN Agenda 21 which is the parent of AGW.
Is the UN a dangerous and malignant bureaucracy? My research points to this.
There is no conspiracy as everything is clearly described and published on official websites etc. All we need to do is read it!
Here is an example on Agenda 21 policy on land.
See the my highlights in red on page 8
No wonder property rights are being abused in my city under the guise of an earthquake recovery.
Ever consider the Agenda 21 wetlands policy. It works like this. 1. Persuade a farmer to part with a swampy area of his farm and label it a ‘wetlands restoration’. 2. Do nothing and let the wetland ‘recover’ which means the original drainage will block and the wetland/swamp will spread further onto the farmer’s land. 3. If the farmer in desperation clears the drainage problem then fine or gaol him. 4. Observing that there are now further spreading swamps ‘wetlands’ encroaching on said farmers land, well take that off him too.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/marlborough-express/news/8790787/Farmer-guilty-of-damaging-Rarangi-wetland
Note that this guy once owned the land in question, it is not mentioned how it was transferred to the government. Also willows are mentioned. Willows are not natural in New Zealand and used to be regarded as pests because they block waterways.
In my country, maybe more than 50% of farms are comprised of more than 90% drained swamp.
Check out the warped thinking on page 12. Re: educating men or women!
My blog has more real life examples!
Please visit both posts.
http://www.thedemiseofchristchurch.com
Cheers
Roger
LikeLike